-
Tempe
-
Lake Havasu City
-
Apache Junction
-
Parker
Drug Trafficking is a serious criminal offense in Arizona that carries significant penalties including jail time, fines, and a permanent record. Contact Matthew Lopez Law for a free consultation to discuss your defense options.
Drug trafficking under ARS 13-3408 is a Class 2 felony carrying years in prison, mandatory fines, and potential federal prosecution. Arizona’s border location makes these cases a top priority for law enforcement. Our defense lawyers fight to protect your future. Call 24/7 for a free consultation.
Arizona sits on the front line of federal drug enforcement. That geographic reality means law enforcement at every level — local police, county task forces, state agencies, DEA, and Border Patrol — aggressively targets drug transportation cases.
If you’ve been charged with transporting narcotic drugs for sale under ARS 13-3408(A)(7), you’re facing a Class 2 felony, mandatory prison if threshold amounts are involved, and the possibility that federal prosecutors may take over your case entirely.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Statute | ARS § 13-3408(A)(7) |
| Classification | Class 2 Felony |
| First Offense (no priors) | 3 years (mitigated) to 12.5 years (aggravated) |
| Presumptive Sentence | 5 years |
| Fentanyl Enhancement — Sale of 200+ grams (F) | 5 to 15 years (first offense); 10 to 20 years (subsequent) — applies to violations of paragraph 2 or 7 |
| Fentanyl Enhancement — Motor vehicle, 200+ grams (H) | 5 to 15 years (first offense); 10 to 20 years (subsequent) — applies to violations of paragraphs 2 and 7 together |
| Mandatory Fine | $2,000 minimum or 3x the drug value (whichever is greater) |
| Probation Eligible | Only if below threshold amount |
| Prop 200 Eligible | No |
Under ARS 13-3408(A)(7), a person shall not knowingly:¹
The statute is broad.
You don’t have to complete a sale or successfully transport drugs across state lines. An offer to transport or an offer to sell is enough to trigger prosecution. And “transport for sale” doesn’t require crossing a border — moving drugs from one location to another within Arizona with the intent to sell qualifies.
“Sale” is defined under ARS 13-3401(32) as an exchange for anything of value or advantage, present or in the future.²
To convict you under ARS 13-3408(A)(7), the prosecution must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt:³
1. You knowingly transported, imported, sold, transferred, or offered to do any of the above.
The prosecution must prove you acted with knowledge — that you knew you were carrying narcotic drugs and knew what you were doing with them.
This is the element that matters most in cases involving unknowing couriers (sometimes called “blind mule” cases), where defendants claim they didn’t know drugs were hidden in a vehicle they were driving.
2. The substance was a narcotic drug.
Confirmed through crime lab testing. The prosecution must prove the substance qualifies as a narcotic drug under ARS 13-3401(20).
3. The transport or transfer was for the purpose of sale.
The prosecution must prove the drugs were being moved for a commercial purpose — not personal use or personal transport. Evidence of sale intent (quantity, packaging, communications, cash) becomes critical.
Drug trafficking investigations in Arizona commonly originate from:
The method of investigation often determines the strongest defense angle — particularly when Fourth Amendment issues are at play.
Per ARS 13-702:⁴
| Sentence | Duration |
|---|---|
| Mitigated | 3 years |
| Minimum | 4 years |
| Presumptive | 5 years |
| Maximum | 10 years |
| Aggravated | 12.5 years |
These ranges increase with alleged prior felony convictions under ARS 13-703.
Under ARS 13-3408(D), if the aggregate amount of narcotic drugs meets or exceeds the statutory threshold defined in ARS 13-3401(36), you are not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon, or release until the sentence is served.⁵ That means mandatory prison.
| Substance | Threshold Amount |
|---|---|
| Heroin | 1 gram |
| Cocaine (powder) | 9 grams |
| Cocaine base (crack) | 750 milligrams |
| PCP | 4 grams or 50 milliliters |
Arizona has two separate fentanyl enhancement provisions that apply to trafficking cases. These enhancements have different triggering conditions.
Sale of 200+ grams of fentanyl — ARS 13-3408(F):⁶
This enhancement applies to violations of subsection A, paragraph 2 or 7 — meaning it can be triggered by either a possession-for-sale conviction or a transport-for-sale conviction involving the sale of at least 200 grams of fentanyl to another person.
| Minimum | Presumptive | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Offense | 5 years | 10 years | 15 years |
| Subsequent Offense | 10 years | 15 years | 20 years |
Possession of 200+ grams of fentanyl in a motor vehicle — ARS 13-3408(H):⁷
This enhancement applies to violations of subsection A, paragraphs 2 and 7 — meaning the state must prove both possession for sale and transport for sale involving at least 200 grams of fentanyl found in a motor vehicle.
| Minimum | Presumptive | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Offense | 5 years | 10 years | 15 years |
| Subsequent Offense | 10 years | 15 years | 20 years |
These enhancements can be mitigated or aggravated under ARS 13-701, subsections D and E.
Every ARS 13-3408 conviction carries a mandatory fine: the greater of $2,000 or three times the value of the drugs involved. This fine cannot be suspended.⁸
Proposition 200 (ARS 13-901.01) mandates probation for first and second personal-use drug possession convictions, but explicitly excludes transportation for sale from eligibility.
Under subsection (C), personal possession or use “shall not include possession for sale, production, manufacturing or transportation for sale of any controlled substance.”⁹
Drug trafficking cases in Arizona can be prosecuted under state law, federal law, or both. Understanding which jurisdiction is pursuing your case — or whether both may file — is critical.
Federal prosecution under 21 U.S.C. § 841 typically happens when:
Federal drug trafficking penalties are generally harsher than state penalties.
Federal mandatory minimum sentences are set by drug type and quantity, with limited judicial discretion.
Federal cases don’t carry parole — you serve the vast majority of the sentence.
Federal prosecutors have access to resources, surveillance tools, and cooperation leverage that state prosecutors typically don’t.
If you’re facing both state and federal exposure, coordination between defense counsel at both levels is essential before making any statements or cooperation agreements.
Arizona courts recognize that drivers are sometimes unaware that drugs are hidden in the vehicle they’re operating.
If you didn’t know the drugs were there — concealed in a hidden compartment, packed inside cargo you were paid to transport, or hidden by someone else — the prosecution cannot prove the “knowingly” element.
Digital evidence, vehicle ownership records, communication history, and the circumstances of how you came to be driving the vehicle all become relevant.
Many trafficking cases begin with a traffic stop. If the initial stop lacked reasonable suspicion, or if the officer extended the stop beyond its lawful purpose without independent justification, everything that followed may be the fruit of the poisonous tree.
We scrutinize dashcam and bodycam footage, the officer’s stated basis for the stop, and the timeline of events.
Beyond the stop itself, we examine whether the search was lawful.
Did you consent? Was consent voluntary? Did the officer have probable cause? Was a warrant obtained for vehicle or phone searches? Was a drug dog sniff conducted lawfully?
If the search violated your constitutional rights, the evidence gets suppressed.
Transporting drugs for personal use is not the same crime as transporting for sale. If you were moving drugs from one location to another for your own consumption, the trafficking charge is wrong.
We present: evidence of personal use history, the absence of sales indicators, and context that explains the movement of drugs without a commercial purpose.
Many trafficking cases rely on confidential informants whose reliability, motives, and credibility can be challenged.
Informants often cooperate to reduce their own charges, creating a powerful incentive to exaggerate or fabricate.
If law enforcement induced you to transport drugs through pressure, manipulation, or coercion — and you would not have done so otherwise — entrapment applies.
Arizona uses an objective test focused on whether the police conduct would have caused a normally law-abiding person to commit the offense.
The weight attributed to the drugs in your case directly affects sentencing — particularly whether threshold amounts trigger mandatory prison.
We challenge: how the quantity was measured, whether fillers and packaging were improperly included in the total weight, and whether the lab analysis meets scientific standards.
Drug trafficking is one of the most aggressively prosecuted offenses in Arizona. The penalties are severe, the enhancements are stacking, and the possibility of federal involvement adds another layer of risk. But aggressive prosecution doesn’t mean automatic conviction.
Every element has to be proven. Every piece of evidence can be challenged. Every constitutional right still applies.
At Matthew Lopez Law, our defense attorneys handle drug trafficking cases across Arizona. We know how these investigations work, where the weaknesses are, and how to fight for the best possible outcome.
Call us 24/7 for a free consultation.
Google Reviews
Successfully Defended
For Arizona Residents
Fighting For You
"*" indicates required fields
This will close in 0 seconds