-
Tempe
-
Lake Havasu City
-
Apache Junction
-
Parker
Robbery Charges in Arizona?
Your Future Is Worth Fighting For.
Robbery under ARS 13-1902 is a class 4 felony in Arizona, and prison is on the table even for a first offense. The state only has to prove force or a threat of force was used to take property or keep it, so no weapon and no injury are required for the charge to stick. We recommend you speak to a criminal defense attorney experienced in handling robbery cases in Maricopa County before your first court date.
Robbery is theft plus force. That is the whole concept behind ARS 13-1902, and it explains why the same act of taking property can be a petty offense or a felony carrying years in prison. A shoplifter who walks out with merchandise has committed theft. The same shoplifter who pushes past a loss prevention officer on the way out has committed robbery.
Arizona builds robbery in three tiers, and where a case lands determines everything. Standard robbery under ARS 13-1902 is a Class 4 felony where probation remains available. Add an accomplice standing next to you and it becomes aggravated robbery, a Class 3 felony. Add a weapon and it becomes armed robbery, a Class 2 felony that usually carries a mandatory seven-year prison floor.
Matthew Lopez Law defends robbery charges throughout Arizona. Contact our firm for a confidential consultation.
A person commits robbery if, in the course of taking any property of another from that person or from that person’s immediate presence and against their will, the person threatens or uses force with the intent either to coerce surrender of the property or to prevent resistance to taking or retaining the property.
Four elements, each contestable:
Taking property of another. The property must belong to someone else. A genuine claim of right to the property is a defense, even if the manner of retrieving it was wrong.
From the person or immediate presence. The property must be taken from the victim’s body or from the area within their control. Property taken from an empty room is theft or burglary, not robbery.
Against the person’s will. Consent defeats the charge.
Force or threat of force. This is the element that separates robbery from theft, and Arizona treats using force and threatening force identically. The threat can be verbal, physical, or implied by conduct.
Robbery does not require that force come first. The statute reaches force used to prevent resistance to retaining the property. That means a completed theft can become a robbery if the person uses force while leaving.
This is how ordinary shoplifting cases become felonies. Pulling away from a security guard, shoving someone who blocks the exit, or struggling during a detention can convert a misdemeanor shoplifting charge into a Class 4 robbery. Whether the contact was force, or merely an attempt to leave, is frequently the entire dispute.
Robbery under ARS 13-1902 is a Class 4 felony.
| Posture | First-Offense Range | Presumptive | Probation |
| Non-dangerous Class 4 felony | 1 to 3.75 years | 2.5 years | Available |
| Dangerous Class 4 felony | 4 to 8 years | 6 years | Not available |
Because standard robbery by definition does not involve a weapon, most ARS 13-1902 charges are non-dangerous, which keeps probation on the table. That is a meaningful distinction from the other two robbery statutes.
Prior felony convictions increase the range substantially under ARS 13-703. A conviction carries fines up to $150,000 plus surcharges under ARS 13-801, restitution to the victim, and the loss of firearm and voting rights until restored.
| Statute | Offense | What Adds the Tier | Class |
| ARS 13-1902 | Robbery | Baseline | Class 4 felony |
| ARS 13-1903 | Aggravated robbery | One or more accomplices actually present | Class 3 felony |
| ARS 13-1904 | Armed robbery | Armed with, or using or threatening, a deadly weapon, simulated deadly weapon, or dangerous instrument | Class 2 felony |
Understanding this ladder is the key to robbery defense. The added element in each higher tier is narrow and specific, which makes it attackable. An accomplice who was not actually present does not support aggravated robbery. An object that was not used or exhibited as a weapon does not support armed robbery. Knocking a case down one tier is usually worth more than any argument about the underlying taking.
No force or threat. This is the central defense. Where property was taken without force, the correct charge is theft under ARS 13-1802, not robbery. Incidental contact, a purse strap slipping, or a snatch accomplished purely by speed rather than force can all fall short of the element.
Force was not connected to the taking. The force must have been used to coerce surrender or prevent resistance. A struggle that broke out for an unrelated reason, or after the taking was complete and abandoned, may not satisfy the statute.
Claim of right. Taking property the defendant genuinely believed belonged to them defeats the intent element, even where the belief was mistaken.
Identification. Robberies are typically fast, stressful events, often at night, frequently involving strangers. Eyewitness identification error is well documented, and surveillance footage, lineup procedures, and the reliability of the initial description are all subject to challenge.
No intent to permanently deprive. Where the property was taken briefly and abandoned, the theft element itself can be contested.
Self-defense. Where the alleged force was actually a response to the other person’s aggression, justification under ARS 13-404 applies.
Duress and coercion. Defendants who participated under genuine threat from another person may have a duress defense.
Reduction to theft. Robbery cases are regularly resolved as theft or shoplifting when the force element is weak. That change removes the violent-offense label and its lasting consequences.
Robbery counts frequently accompany aggravated assault, kidnapping where the victim was held in place, burglary under ARS 13-1507, threatening or intimidating, and theft. Prosecutors often stack counts arising from a single incident, which makes challenging duplicative charges part of the defense.
Robbery cases are won on the force element and on the tier. Establishing that no force was used, that the force was not connected to the taking, or that the aggravating element for a higher tier is absent can move a case from mandatory prison to probation, or out of the violent crime category entirely.
We serve clients in Tempe, Mesa, Apache Junction, Lake Havasu, Parker, and statewide. Payment plans available. Every interaction confidential.
Contact us for a free consultation.
Every minute counts when you’re facing criminal charges in Arizona. Whether you were just arrested or have court next week, our team is ready to start building your defense right now. We offer free consultations and can start protecting your rights today with flexible payment plans that work for your budget.
Real person answers,
not voicemail
No obligation, no pressure
Start your defense with
minimal money down
Google Reviews
Successfully Defended
For Arizona Residents
Fighting For You
"*" indicates required fields
This will close in 0 seconds